Thursday, January 3, 2013

Looking forward: 2013 | The Legal Genealogist

Speaking out in the New Year

So? here?s a surprise for you? The Legal Genealogist? a genealogist with a law degree? a graduate school educator? and I like to hear myself talk.

You can mark that down as the major shock of the New Year, right?

And if you wanna come hear me hear myself talk, here are some options for you in 2013:


January

14-18: Faculty, SLIG (Course 9: Thomas W. Jones, Ph.D., CG, CGL, Advanced Genealogical Methods)
???????Bringing Law to Bear on Complex Genealogical Problems

March

10: Monmouth County (NJ) Genealogical Society
???????Beyond X and Y: The Promise and Pitfalls of Autosomal DNA Testing

20: APG Professional Management Conference, Salt Lake City
???????Order in the Court: Hands-on with Court Records
???????More Than the Begats: Using the Law to Spice up a Research Report

April

5: Fairfax County (VA) Genealogical Society Spring Conference
???????From Blackstone to the Statutes at Large ? How Knowing the Law Makes Us Better Genealogists
????????To the Honorable, the General Assembly of Virginia?
????????No Person Shall ? Gallop Horses In the Streets?
????????An Act for the Relief of Gregory Thomas and Others?

10: Legacy Family Tree Webinar
???????That First Trip to the Courthouse

12: Great Lakes Chapter, APG, Cleveland OH
???????The ABCs of DNA

13: Western Reserve Historical Society, Cleveland OH
???????How Knowing the Law Makes Us Better Genealogists
???????Using Court Records to tell Our Family Stories
???????Widows, Orphans, and the Law
???????Through the Golden Door: Immigration After the Civil War (1864-1924)

17: Forget-Me-Not Hour, BlogTalkRadio with Jane E. Wilcox

22: Genealogical Society of Bergen County, NJ
???????To be determined

May

8-11: National Genealogical Society Conference, Las Vegas NV
???????Blackguards and Black Sheep: The Lighter Side of the Law
???????From Blackstone to Statutes at Large?How Knowing the Law Makes Us Better Genealogists

18-19: Seattle Genealogical Society Spring Conference, Seattle WA
???????How Knowing the Law Makes Us Better Genealogists
???????Where There Is ? or Isn?t ? a Will
????????Don?t Forget the Ladies?: Women and the Law
???????Using Court Records to tell the Story of our Ancestors? Lives
???????Workshop: Building a Family through Circumstantial Evidence

23: Fairfax County (VA) Genealogical Society
???????No Vitals? No Problem! Building a Family through Circumstantial Evidence

June

6-9: SCGS Jamboree
???????To be determined

10-14: Faculty, IGHR (Course 6: Elissa Scalise Powell, CG, CGL, Genealogy as a Profession)
???????Copyright for the Genealogist

22: Patchogue-Medford (NY) Public Library
???????DNA Goes Genderless: Autosomal DNA

26: Legacy Family Tree Webinar
???????How Knowing the Law Makes Us Better Genealogists

July

20: Massachusetts Genealogical Council
???????Building a Family through Circumstantial Evidence: Breaking Through the 20th Century Brickwall
???????From Blackstone to Statutes at Large?How Knowing the Law Makes Us Better Genealogists
????????No Person Shall ? Gallop Horses In the Streets? ? Using Court Records to tell the Story of our Ancestors? Lives

August

21-24: Federation of Genealogical Societies Conference, Fort Wayne IN
???????Speak, Write, and Publish Safely ? Staying Out of Copyright Trouble
???????Who, What, Why, When, Where and How of American Divorce
???????Roadblocks, Red Lights and Detours: Records Access Issues

September

5: German Genealogy Group, Hicksville NY
???????The ABCs of DNA
10: Illinois State Genealogical Society Webinar
????????To the Honorable, the General Assembly? ? The Treasure Trove in Legislative Petitions

October

12: BCG-ASG
???????(BCG 50th anniversary)

30: Legacy Family Tree Webinar
???????Using Court Records to tell the Story of our Ancestors? Lives

November

14: Hudson County (NJ) Genealogical Society
???????Building a Family through Circumstantial Evidence

Source: http://www.legalgenealogist.com/blog/2013/01/01/looking-forward-2013/

front door alyssa bustamante protandim weightless ellen degeneres jcpenney yeardley love nba all star reserves

Recommended Service Intervals At Fenski Automotive Center ...

Most people in the Buford area are aware that automotive manufacturers have recommended service intervals. Following recommended service intervals is very important. The engineers that design our vehicles have tested the various systems and components to meet durability and safety standards. Some of these standards are self-imposed and others, like those for emissions components, are government mandated for the areas around Suwanee, Flowery branch and Dacula in Georgia.

The maintenance schedules are designed to achieve the standards. Think of the benefits of following recommended intervals as falling into three general categories: Protection, Efficiency and Safety.

Protection. Let?s start with motor oil. First of all, the engineers recommend a particular weight and type of motor oil for your vehicle. All of their oil change recommendations assume using the proper motor oil. Motor oil contains detergents and other additives that clean the engine and provide corrosion resistance. Over time, the additives are depleted. The oil also becomes contaminated by water, dirt and combustion gases.

Extending your interval beyond the recommendation means that your vehicle engine will be operating without the full protection of fresh motor oil. It also means that sludge can form in contaminated oil and clog up passages in the engine, starving parts from needed lubrication.

Efficiency. Some services are designed to keep automotive systems operating efficiently. For example, the fuel system gets clogged up with gum and varnish from the fuel. Fuel doesn?t flow efficiently which reduces fuel economy. A fuel system cleaning restores the fuel system?s efficiency and increases your gas mileage.

Safety. Your brakes are obviously one of the most important safety systems on your vehicle. The manufacturer has scheduled brake pad replacement as well as power brake fluid drain and replacement intervals. Because brakes are so important, a brake inspection is also on the schedule to head off problems before they result in an accident.

Check your owner?s manual for recommended service schedules or talk with your Sugar Hill service advisor at Fenski Automotive Center by calling 770-945-4556. You?ll find our shop located at 1010 Peachtree Industrial Blvd. in Sugar Hill, Georgia 30518.

You may be surprised to learn that various inspections may be on your list of factory recommendations for your vehicle. These inspections are usually at major intervals like fifteen or thirty thousand miles. They?re designed to uncover important parts that may be close to failing.

Your vehicle owner?s manual can tell you when to change your oil, but it can?t tell you that you have a radiator hose that?s bulging and about to burst. For that you need a trained auto technician. These scheduled inspections are in addition to the multi-point inspections done with a full-service oil change.

Source: http://fenskiauto.com/recommended-service-intervals-at-fenski-automotive-center/

Alan Turing brave Stephanie Rice Meet the Pyro Karen Klein Colorado fires supreme court

Religion Clause: Montana High Court Upholds Extending Workers ...

In Big Sky Colony, Inc. v. Montana Department of Labor and Industry,?(MT Sup. Ct., Dec. 31, 2012), the Montana Supreme Court in a 4-3 decision upheld against constitutional attack amendments to the state's workers compensation law that brings Hutterite Colonies within the definition of those covered when their members perform agricultural, manufacturing or construction services even though members do not receive wages. Instead Hutterites receive food, shelter, clothing and medical care from the Colony. ?The new law applies so long as the Colony receives remuneration from outsiders for member services. The majority rejected free exercise, establishment clause and equal protection challenges to the law, finding that the law is neutral in its application and does not single out religious beliefs.

Justice Rice, joined by Justices Cotter and Nelson, dissented arguing that the legislature "created a clear religious gerrymander" in response to complaints about Hutterite colonies competing with other Montana businesses without have to provide workers' compensation insurance. Justice Nelson also filed a separate dissent. ?AP reported on the court's decision.

Source: http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2013/01/montana-high-court-upholds-extending.html

Olympics 2012 Olympic Schedule 2012 NBC Olympics NBC Olympics schedule 2012 Olympics Chad Everett London Olympics

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Best and worst movie posters of 2012

By Gael Fashingbauer Cooper, NBC News

A great movie poster should sell the movie and make you inscribe the film's opening date in your mind. Admittedly, some of these posters, even the good ones, fail at that. Some are stunning but don't even display the film's title, and may not have brought in one extra ticket sale. That's the studio marketing department's problem, not ours. We're voting just on style here, not substance.

Here are our pics for the four best and four worst movie posters of 2012.

BEST
'Zero Dark Thirty'
The title is there, but it's smeared over with black, as if the CIA itself came in and erased the name of the film. Fitting and creepy for the controversial movie about the hunt for Osama bin Laden.?

Sony Pictures

'Wreck-It Ralph'
The animated film holds charms not just for children, but for their parents and caregivers, who still hold fond memories of hours spent in 1980s and 1990s arcades. So the retro, 8-bit style of this poster fits right in.

Walt Disney Pictures

'V/H/S'
In this cult horror flick, a group of thieves end up watching a number of horrible events on videotapes while looking for the one particular tape they're supposed to steal. The tapes in this poster line up to make a most menacing skull.

Magnet Releasing

'Argo'

The faux-shredding on this poster not only looks cool, but it fits in with the movie's plot, as American employees in Iran desperately try to shred important documents and later, Iranian children are ordered to try and piece them back together to try and identify the Americans in hiding.

Warner Bros. Pictures

WORST
'Ted'
Ha! Get it, the bear is at the urinal along with the human and ... ugh, whatever.

Universal Pictures

'What to Expect When You're Expecting'
Making a movie out of a pregnancy advice book was a horrible idea. The studio just liked the clicky title. This poster does nothing to convince anyone except pregnancy fetishists to see the film.?

Lionsgate

'Alex Cross'
Critics weren't fans of "Alex Cross," though some liked Tyler Perry's performance. The poster shrinks Perry, who's shot in kind of a Batman style, and puts his figure inside villain Matthew Fox. Do you want to see the film based on this???Can you even tell who the hero is??

Summit Entertainment

'John Carter'
And at last we come to "John Carter," possibly the year's most-trumpeted flop. It cost nearly a quarter of a billion dollars and confused viewers and critics alike. This poster did not help.

Walt Disney / Pixar

Related content:

Source: http://entertainment.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/31/16218742-best-and-worst-movie-posters-of-2012?lite

the band colton dixon houston weather dwyane wade the night they drove old dixie down levon oklahoma city bombing

Senate passes 'cliff' deal, House up next

With 2013 just over two hours old, the Senate voted 89-8 on Tuesday to approve a last-minute deal to avert income tax hikes on all but the richest Americans and stall painful spending cuts as part of a hard-fought compromise to avoid the economically toxic ?fiscal cliff.?

The country had already technically tumbled over the cliff by the time the gavel came down on the vote at 2:07 a.m.. The House of Representatives was not due to return to work to take up the measure until midday on Tuesday. But with financial markets closed for New Year's Day, quick action by lawmakers would likely limit the economic damage.

The lopsided margin belied anxiety on both sides about the deal, which emerged from barely two days of talks between Vice President Joe Biden and Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Among the ?no? votes: Republican Senator Marco Rubio, widely thought to have his eye on the 2016 presidential race.

In remarks just before the vote, McConnell repeatedly called the agreement ?imperfect? but said it beat allowing income tax rates rise across the board.

?I know I can speak for my entire conference when I say we don?t think taxes should be going up on anyone, but we all knew that if we did nothing they?d be going up on everyone today,? he said. ?We weren?t going to let that happen.?

?Our most important priority was to protect middle-class families. This legislation does that,? Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said. But Reid cautioned that ?passing this agreement does not mean negotiations halt. Far from it.?

Compromises on tax rates

Under the compromise arrangement, taxes would rise on income above $400,000 for individuals and $450,000 for households, while exemptions and deductions the wealthiest Americans use to reduce their tax bill would face new limits. The accord would also raise the taxes paid on large inheritances from 35% to 40% for estates over $5 million. And it would extend by one year unemployment benefits for some two million Americans. It would also prevent cuts in payments to doctors who treat Medicare patients and spare tens of millions of Americans who otherwise would have been hit with the Alternative Minimum Tax.

The middle class will still see its taxes go up: The final deal did not include an extension of the payroll tax holiday. And the overall package will deepen the deficit by hundreds of billions of dollars by extending the overwhelming majority of the Bush tax cuts. Many Democrats had opposed those measures in 2001 and 2003. Obama agreed to extend them in 2010.

Efforts to modify the first installment of $1.2 trillion in cuts to domestic and defense programs over 10 years -- the other portion of the ?fiscal cliff,? known as sequestration -- had proved a sticking point late in the game. Democrats had sought a year-long freeze but ultimately caved to Republican pressure and signed on to just a two-month delay while broader deficit-reduction talks continue.

Debt-limit battle looms

That would put the next major battle over spending cuts right around the time that the White House and its Republican foes are battling it out over whether to raise the country's debt limit. Republicans have vowed to push for more spending cuts, equivalent to the amount of new borrowing. Obama has vowed not to negotiate as he did in 2011, when a bruising fight threatened the first-ever default on America's obligations and resulted in the first-ever downgrade of the country's credit rating. Biden sent that message to Democrats in Congress, two senators said.

Experts had warned that the fiscal cliff's tax increases and spending cuts, taken together, could plunge the still-fragile economy into a new recession.

Biden, evidently in good spirits after playing a central role in crafting the deal, said little on his way into or out of a roughly one hour and 45 minute meeting behind closed doors with Senate Democrats. "Happy New Year," he said on the way in. Asked on the way out what his chief selling point had been, the vice president reportedly replied: "Me."

Biden's intervention; hurdles in the House

Hours earlier, a Democratic Senate aide told Yahoo News that "the White House and Republicans have a deal," while a source familiar with the negotiations said President Barack Obama had discussed the compromise with Reid and Democratic House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and "they both signed off."

But the House?s Republican leaders, including Speaker John Boehner, hinted in an unusual joint statement that they might amend anything that clears the Senate ? a step that could kill the deal.

?Decisions about whether the House will seek to accept or promptly amend the measure will not be made until House members -- and the American people -- have been able to review the legislation,? they said.

Biden, a 36-year Senate veteran, worked out the agreement with McConnell after talks between Obama and Boehner collapsed and a similar effort between McConnell and Reid followed suit shortly thereafter. With the deal mostly done, Obama made a final push at the White House.

?Today, it appears that an agreement to prevent this New Year's tax hike is within sight, but it's not done,? Obama said in hastily announced midday remarks at the White House. ?There are still issues left to resolve, but we're hopeful that Congress can get it done ? but it?s not done.?

"One thing we can count on with respect to this Congress is that if there is even one second left before you have to do what you?re supposed to do, they will use that last second," he said.

Obama?s remarks ? by turns scolding, triumphant, and mocking of Congress ? came after talks between McConnell and Biden appeared to seal the breakthrough deal.

?I can report that we?ve reached an agreement on all of the tax issues,? McConnell said on the Senate floor moments later. ?We are very, very close to an agreement.?

The Kentucky Republican later briefed Republicans on the details of the deal. Lawmakers emerged from that closed-door session offered hopeful appraisals that, after clearing a few last-minute hurdles, they could vote on New Year?s Eve or with 2013 just hours old.

?Tonight, I hope,? Republican Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee told reporters. ?It may be at 1, 2, 3, 4 in the morning. Oh, I guess that?s technically tomorrow.?

Reckoning with the 'sequester'

Republican Senators said negotiators were still working on a way to forestall two months of the ?sequester? spending cuts, about $20 billion worth. And some expressed disquiet that the tentative compromise ran high on tax increases and low on spending cuts -- while warning that failure to act, triggering some $600 billion in income tax increases on all Americans who pay it and draconian spending cuts, was the worse option.

McConnell earlier had called for a vote on the tax component of the deal.

?Let me be clear: We?ll continue to work on finding smarter ways to cut spending, but let?s not let that hold up protecting Americans from the tax hike,? McConnell urged. ?Let?s pass the tax relief portion now. Let?s take what?s been agreed to and get moving.?

House passage was not a sure thing: Both the AFL-CIO labor union and the conservative Heritage Action organization argued against the package.

The breakthrough came after McConnell announced Sunday that he had started to negotiate with Biden in a bid to "jump-start" stalled talks to avoid the fiscal cliff.

Under their tentative deal, the top tax rate on household income above $450,000 would rise from 35 percent to 39.6 percent -- where it was under Bill Clinton, before the reductions enacted under George W. Bush in 2001 and 2003.

Some congressional liberals had expressed objections to extending tax cuts above the $250,000 income threshold Obama cited throughout the 2012 campaign. Democrats were huddling in private as well to work out whether they could support the arrangement.

Obama responds to critics

Possibly with balking progressives in mind, Obama trumpeted victories dear to the left of his party. "The potential agreement that?s being talked about would not only make sure the taxes don?t go up on middle-class families, it also would extend tax credits for families with children. It would extend our tuition tax credit that?s helped millions of families pay for college. It would extend tax credits for clean energy companies that are creating jobs and reducing our dependence on foreign oil. It would extend unemployment insurance to 2 million Americans who are out there still actively looking for a job."

Obama said he had hoped for "a larger agreement, a bigger deal, a grand bargain," to stem the tide of red ink swamping the country?s finances ? but shelved that goal.

"With this Congress, that was obviously a little too much to hope for at this time," he said. "It may be we can do it in stages. We?re going to solve this problem instead in several steps."

The president also looked ahead to his next budgetary battle with Republicans, warning that ?any future deficit agreement? will have to couple spending cuts with tax increases. He expressed a willingness to reduce spending on popular programs like Medicare, but said entitlement reform would have to go hand in hand with new tax revenues.

?If Republicans think that I will finish the job of deficit reduction through spending cuts alone ? then they?ve another thing coming,? Obama said defiantly. ?That?s not how it?s going to work.?

?If we?re serious about deficit reduction and debt reduction, then it?s going to have to be a matter of shared sacrifice. At least as long as I?m president. And I?m going to be president for the next four years, I hope,? he said.

The other ?no? votes were: Michael Bennet (D-Col.), Tom Carper (D-Del.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Rand Paul (R-Ken.), and Richard Shelby (R-Ala.). Republicans Jim DeMint of South Carolina and Mark Kirk of Illinois as well as Democrat Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey did not vote.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/senate-passes--fiscal-cliff--deal--house-up-next-082813845.html

epidermolysis bullosa miss wisconsin law abiding citizen golden globes 2012 miss america lana del rey saturday night live focus on the family

Markets calm despite looming fiscal cliff

LONDON (AP) ? Markets appeared Monday to be taking in stride the prospect that U.S. politicians will fail to agree a budget deal in time to avoid automatic tax increases and spending cuts that many economists think could tilt the world's largest economy back into recession.

With just hours to go before the U.S. falls off the so-called "fiscal cliff," Republicans and Democrats remained divided over tax and spend, raising the prospect that markets will start 2013 without a clear idea of America's budget policy. The main sticking point appears to be what level of taxes are imposed on higher incomes.

Discussions in the Senate broke off Sunday night without an agreement. The Senators will return to their offices Monday to try and hammer out a deal before the deadline.

"With the gulf between both parties still wide and the desire to protect their supporters' key interests so ingrained, it is difficult to see how both sides can compromise enough to agree a deal at this point," said Rebecca O'Keeffe, head of investment at Interactive Investor.

However, it's not the first time that budget discussions in the U.S. have gone down to the wire, and investors remain confident that some sort of deal will be reached, if not Monday then in the coming days or weeks. As a result, they think that the potential damage wrought by higher taxes and spending cuts will be limited.

In addition, a backup proposal that would address only a few issues is expected to be presented by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, if a bipartisan deal is not reached.

The prospect of counter-measures to offset the "fiscal cliff" impact helps explain why markets were fairly calm in Europe and Asia, and Wall Street was poised to open higher.

In Europe, the FTSE 100 index of leading British shares was down 0.4 percent at 5,901 but the CAC-40 in France was 0.4 percent higher at 3,633. Most European indexes are only trading for half of the day ahead of the New Year break, while others including Germany's DAX were closed.

U.S. stocks were poised for gains at the open, with Dow futures up 0.2 percent and the broader S&P 500 futures 0.4 percent higher, even though in theory, the U.S. faces around $671 billion of tax increases and spending cuts over the coming months, equivalent to the sort of fiscal tightening taking place in highly indebted Europe.

Clearly, their full imposition would hobble an economy that has shown some signs of late of a more sustainable economic recovery.

Some economists predict the tax-and-spending effects of the "fiscal cliff" could eventually throw the U.S. economy back into recession ? although if the deadline passes, politicians still have a few weeks to keep the tax hikes and spending cuts at bay by repealing them retroactively once a deal is reached.

"It is likely that many of the fiscal cliff measures allow a certain amount of room within which the government can introduce measures to refrain from any tax increases," said Joshua Mahony, an analyst at Alpari.

Still, the failure to adhere to the deadline following weeks of squabbling and procrastination could be view negatively by the major credit rating agencies and weigh on investor confidence going into 2013.

"I think the market reaction to that will be very negative. This means the U.S. will never be able to bring its house in order. And the deficit will continue to accumulate," said Francis Lun, managing director of Lyncean Holdings in Hong Kong. "No meaningful reform and no solution in sight. You can throw confidence out of the window."

Earlier in Asia, the picture was fairly subdued in those markets that were open ? among others, markets in Japan and South Korea were closed for the New Year's holidays.

Hong Kong's Hang Seng, trading for a half-day, closed marginally lower at 22,656.92, while mainland Chinese stocks rose after a private survey showed the country's manufacturing growth at its strongest level in 18 months in December. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 fell 0.5 percent to close at 4,648.90.

There was also a fairly calm atmosphere in other financial markets, with the euro down just 0.2 percent at $1.3191 and the price of benchmark New York crude down 11 cents at $90.69 a barrel.

____

Sampson contributed from Bangkok.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/markets-calm-despite-looming-fiscal-cliff-110210983--finance.html

denver nuggets correspondents dinner i am legend san antonio spurs greta van susteren tony parker the five year engagement

Great White. As I was taking this shot along a golf course, a...

Great White.

As I was taking this shot along a golf course, a twosome drove up and the man told me about a pelican he saw the day before. ?The pelican had caught a fish too big to carry very far, so he dropped it in the middle of the fairway. ?As other pelicans, egrets and cormorants began to notice and come over along came an eagle, who swooped down and carried the fish away.

It?s always the shots you DIDN?T get?

outerbostonia

December 25, 2012

Source: http://danagel.tumblr.com/post/39213894639

mississippi state chris carpenter chris carpenter dick cheney hcg drops reason rally mad hatter